Squawk
Get early access →
Aviation Regulatory AI

The aviation regulatory copilot.
Defensible citations only.

Built for aviation attorneys, Part 135 operators, A&Ps, CFIs, and pilots. Every claim cited to 14 CFR, FAA Orders, ACs, ADs, or NTSB precedent — and verified against our corpus before display.

Built by the team behind LawStack.

How the AI answers

Real FAA questions. Real citations. Every one verified.

Q.Can I log a circle-to-land approach for instrument currency under §61.57(c)?

Generally yes — if the descent to circling minimums (MDA) is conducted under actual or simulated instrument conditions.

14 CFR §61.57(c) requires six instrument approaches “performed and logged” within the preceding six calendar months, under “actual or simulated instrument flight conditions.”

The FAA Chief Counsel addressed circle-to-land in the Hicks (2011) Legal Interpretation: the instrument-approach segment must be flown in actual or simulated IMC, but the circling maneuver itself does not require IMC. Once you've descended to MDA in instrument conditions, the approach counts.

  • Counts: IMC descent to MDA, then circle in VMC after breakout; simulated instrument (hooded) all the way to MDA
  • Does not count: cancelling IFR before the approach; flying the entire approach in VMC

Sources14 CFR §61.57(c); FAA Chief Counsel Hicks Letter (Sept 2011).

Q.Letter of Investigation cites §91.13 'careless and reckless' — what's the typical enforcement scope?

14 CFR §91.13(a): “No person may operate an aircraft in a careless or reckless manner so as to endanger the life or property of another.”

How it's used: §91.13 is typically paired with a more specific underlying violation as a blanket catch-all. Common pairings: low-altitude (§91.119), VFR-into-IMC (§91.155, §91.157), aerobatic (§91.303), runway incursions.

Standard for violation: NTSB precedent (Administrator v. Roach, 2005) requires showing actual or potential endangerment of another — not just a technical violation. Self-endangerment alone is generally insufficient under §91.13(a).

LOI response framework (FAA Order 2150.3): ten-day response window; do not admit; engage counsel; defense frequently turns on the absence of actual endangerment to third parties.

Sources14 CFR §91.13(a); Administrator v. Roach, NTSB Order EA-5180 (2005); FAA Order 2150.3.

Q.Sport Pilot at night — any conditions where it's allowed?

No. A Sport Pilot may not act as PIC at night under any conditions.

14 CFR §61.315(c)(5) prohibits a Sport Pilot from acting as PIC of a light-sport aircraft at night. This restriction is absolute — no endorsement removes it. To act as PIC at night, the pilot must hold at minimum a Private Pilot certificate.

“Night” is defined in 14 CFR §1.1 as the period between the end of evening civil twilight and the beginning of morning civil twilight (per the Air Almanac, converted to local time).

Other Sport Pilot restrictions (§61.315(c)): no Class A airspace; Class B/C/D requires endorsement; above 10,000 ft MSL or 2,000 AGL (whichever is higher) prohibited; visibility <3 SM prohibited; no operation without visual surface reference.

Sources14 CFR §61.315(c)(5); 14 CFR §1.1.

How is this different?

The wedge: a tool that won't pretend to know what it doesn't.

ChatGPTWestlaw / LexisSquawk
Hallucinated citationsCommon (Mata v. Avianca)NoBlocked by verifier
Aviation-specific corpusNoGeneric legal corpus14 CFR + FAA + NTSB
Refusal when out of corpusGuesses confidentlySearch returns 0 resultsSays “I don’t know”
Audit log per answerNoSearch historyYes — per query
Built forEveryoneBigLaw + corporatesAviation specialists
Who it's for

One corpus. Four tiers of practitioners.

Aviation attorneys

FAA enforcement defense, certificate actions, aircraft transactions.

Replace the part of Westlaw you actually use, at a fraction of the price. Solo and small-firm tiers.

Part 135 / 141 operators

Continuous compliance, AD applicability, MEL/CDL interpretation.

Fleet-level reg tracking and fast answers to ops questions.

A&P / IA mechanics

AD compliance, IA renewal, signoff authority.

Look up applicable ADs by aircraft serial number, get cited interpretations of §43 maintenance regs.

Pilots + CFIs

Currency, checkride prep, ramp checks, BasicMed, Sport Pilot, IPC.

Pull up the reg that just got asked about, with citations to the actual section.

Frequently asked

Plain answers, before you sign up.

How is this different from ChatGPT for aviation questions?
ChatGPT will confidently cite regs and cases that don't exist. The 2023 Mata v. Avianca sanctions case showed what happens when lawyers rely on it. Squawk runs every citation through a verifier against our indexed corpus before display. If a citation doesn't exist, the response is blocked. If we can't ground an answer in our corpus, we say so instead of making one up.
What corpus does it use?
14 CFR (the full Federal Aviation Regulations), FAA Orders (including 8900.1 Inspector Handbook and 2150.3 Enforcement), Advisory Circulars, the Airworthiness Directives database, NTSB ALJ and Board orders, FAA Chief Counsel Legal Interpretations, and DOT aviation case law.
When can I use it?
Beta opens Q3 2026. Early-access list gets in first. Founding-member pricing locks in for the first 12 months.
Who's behind this?
Built by the team behind LawStack — the legal reference app used by solo attorneys, paralegals, law students, and pro se litigants. Squawk is the AI layer on top of the trusted primary-source corpus we've maintained for years.
How much will it cost?
Tiered pricing across pilots/CFIs, Part 135 operators and A&Ps, solo aviation attorneys, and small firms. Plus one-time matter passes for acute events like an FAA Letter of Investigation. Founding-member rates lock in for early-access signups — final pricing confirmed before beta opens.
Will it replace my attorney?
No. Squawk is a research tool for practitioners and an explainer for everyone else. It is not legal advice. Attorneys use it to be faster; non-attorneys use it to be informed.

Ready to get a real answer to your next FAA reg question?

Early-access list opens beta first. Founding-member pricing locks in.

Optional — what would you pay per month?